Rendered at 10:03:13 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
Yahyaaa 13 hours ago [-]
How do you prevent the rule system itself from becoming the thing you end up tinkering with instead of actually using it for focus?
thisislorenzov 12 hours ago [-]
You don't. Or at least, I don't, hence the title.
lionelgarnier 21 hours ago [-]
Was going to try this tonight, but, well... tomorrow.
Jokes aside, I like the part with the visual layer over mitmproxy addons.
Question: since custom nodes run unsandboxed, how are you thinking about the "let an LLM write the policies" angle?
thisislorenzov 21 hours ago [-]
Assuming that we're not dealing with bizantine failures (e.g. the LLM has not been hijacked/compromised), the worst that can happen is that it introduces some nodes with blocking calls and our local machine traffic stops. At that point, we can just disable the proxy and check where the LLM fucked up.
The bizantine failure assumption is fundamental though: If by any chance some LLM injects a rule like "send traffic to xyz", the story changes.
As usual, always doublecheck the LLM work. Triple-check it whenever redirection of traffic is involved.
lionelgarnier 21 hours ago [-]
[dead]
galsapir 22 hours ago [-]
i feel like i've had exactly the same thought in the past :-0 might even have written about it. feel your pain
thisislorenzov 22 hours ago [-]
As someone wise told me, it's just a procrastination ouroboros
The bizantine failure assumption is fundamental though: If by any chance some LLM injects a rule like "send traffic to xyz", the story changes.
As usual, always doublecheck the LLM work. Triple-check it whenever redirection of traffic is involved.